Publication
EAIIoT 2027 invites submissions of original research papers that make substantial contributions to the field. All accepted manuscripts will be published in the conference proceedings. In commitment to academic integrity and high quality, the conference employs a rigorous double-blind peer-review process, with each submission evaluated by an average of three independent experts. Accepted papers will be presented either as oral talks or as posters during the conference.
Review Policy
The review process of EAIIoT 2027 is double-blind. Each submission is anonymously reviewed by an average of three independent reviewers, to ensure the final high standard and quality of each accepted submission. The technical program committee will perform a shrinking process for the submitted paper about the scope and tracks of the conferences prior to the review process. EAIIoT 2027 guarantees that the entire peer review and publication process is meticulous and objective. Furthermore, all works not in accordance with these standards will be removed from the publication if malpractice is revealed at any time even after the publication.
Authors, reviewers and conference Chairs will be asked to indicate their understanding and acceptance of the Publishing Policy on Conflict of Interest in Publication when items are submitted and reviewed.
Review Criteria
Reviewers evaluate the submitted paper based on the following criteria:
(1) Is the subject matter within the scope of the conference?
(2) Does the paper contain enough original results to warrant publication?
(3) Is the paper technically sound and free of errors?
(4) Is the work clearly and concisely presented? Is it well organized?
(5) Does the title clearly and sufficiently reflect its contents?
(6) Is the abstract informative? Are the main results and conclusions mentioned?
(7) Are the illustrations of adequate quality, relevant and understandable?
(8) Does the bibliography give a clear view of the current state-of-the-art in the domain?
(9) Is the quality of the language satisfactory?
(10) Are symbols, terms, and concepts adequately defined?
(11) How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?
Acceptance of the Manuscript
Reviewers will send the suggestions/comments to the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.